SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
RAYAPANENI UMADEVI – Appellant
Versus
BHEEMINENI VAMSI KIRAN – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

These two civil revision petitions are filed challenging the order in I.A.Nos.492 & 493 of 2019 in O.S.No.81 of 2010 passed by the X Additional District Judge, Tirupati on 28.08.2019.

The petitioners filed I.A.Nos.492 & 493 of 2019 in O.S.No.81 of 2010 under Section 151 and Order XVIII Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code (for short ‘C.P.C’) to reopen the plaintiffs’ evidence and recall P.W.6 for further examination. I.A.Nos.492 & 493 of 2019 in O.S.No.81 of 2010 were dismissed of by the trial Court after hearing both the counsel. Aggrieved by the orders, the present civil revision petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, raising several contentions.

I.A.No.492 of 2019 is filed under Section 151 C.P.C to reopen the plaintiffs’ evidence and I.A.No.493 of 2019 is filed for recall of P.W.6 for further examination. The allegations made in the affidavit filed in the interlocutory applications and reasons for claiming such relief are identical. Therefore, it is unnecessary to extract the contentions in both the affidavits and it is suffice to advert to the affidavit filed in one of the petitions.

The petitioners filed O.S.No.81 of 2010 for declaring the ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top