Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N, J
J ALADANKI SRINIVASA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to coerced acceptance of tdr bonds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. obligation of authorities to follow due process in land acquisition. (Para 4 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. clarification of statutory provisions and their implications in acquisition. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's directive regarding possession and compliance with legal protocols. (Para 11) |
The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 2nd respondent in marking the petitioner’s property admeasuring 29.3/9 square yards of land in T.S.No.268 along with a RCC G+1 structure, wherein the petitioner is running a shop bearing Door No.37-1-349, Assessment No.1035002523.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is pressurized by the 2nd respondent and their officers to accept the TDR certificates in return for handing over 29.3/9 square yards property for the purpose of road widening. It is submitted that the respondent authorities cannot force the petitioner to accept TDR bonds while acquiring the property belonging to the petitioner for public purposes. It is also submitted that the TDR bonds would not meet the requirements of the petitioner as an alternative to compensation for the land acquired.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
