Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
MUKESH KUMAR CHOWDARY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. definition and context of the criminal petition and allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments for bail and personal circumstances. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's opposition to bail based on petitioner's history. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's analysis of risks associated with granting bail. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final decision regarding the petition for bail. (Para 9) |
ORDER:
This criminal petition has been filed under Section s 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , seeking to enlarge the petitioner- accused No. 7on bail in crime No. 40of 2014 of Maredimilli Police Station, East Godavari District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) (B)read with Section8 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .
CASE OF THE PROSECUTION:
2. On 26-07-2014 at about 2 p.m. at the outskirts of Somireddypalem of Maredumili Village, on Maredumilli to Chintoor Road, the Inspector of Police, Maredimilli Police Station, along with his staff and mediators found and arrested accused Nos. 2 to 9 while they were transporting 400 K.Gs. of Ganja. Thereafter, the police seized the contraband, arrested accused Nos. 2 to 9 and remanded them to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
