SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
MUKESH KUMAR CHOWDARY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: VEERLA SATEESH KUMAR
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ORDER:

This criminal petition has been filed under Section s 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , seeking to enlarge the petitioner- accused No. 7on bail in crime No. 40of 2014 of Maredimilli Police Station, East Godavari District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) (B)read with Section8 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .

CASE OF THE PROSECUTION:

2. On 26-07-2014 at about 2 p.m. at the outskirts of Somireddypalem of Maredumili Village, on Maredumilli to Chintoor Road, the Inspector of Police, Maredimilli Police Station, along with his staff and mediators found and arrested accused Nos. 2 to 9 while they were transporting 400 K.Gs. of Ganja. Thereafter, the police seized the contraband, arrested accused Nos. 2 to 9 and remanded them to judicial custody. It is the further case of prosecution that accused No. 1 escaped from the scene.

CONTENTIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER:

3. Sri V.Sateesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is innocentand has been falsely implicated in the alleged offence, without any cogent evidence linking to the commission of the crime.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top