Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
DAYAM PEDA RANGA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT DIRECTOR, (RAYALASEERNA) ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, A.P – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concept of fir registration against unnotified police station. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. authorization proceedings for registering cases under pc act. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. definition and significance of police station notification. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. voidability of unnotified police station registrations. (Para 13 , 39 , 40) |
| 5. arguments on jurisdictional integrity post-state bifurcation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. quashing of cases due to timing of station notification. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
COMMON ORDER :
1. Criminal petition No.3955 of 2021 is taken up as the lead case in the batch of petitions filed seeking quash of crimes registered by Inspector of Police, Central Investigation Unit (CIU), ACB, Vijayawada for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The primary ground for seeking quash of the crimes is that Government has not notified Central Investigation Unit (CIU), ACB, Vijayawada as a Police Station under Section 2(s) of Cr.P.C., as on the date of registration of crimes.
2. This Court while admitting the matters directed the investigating officer not to file charge sheet until further orders from the Court. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners subm
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
