Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
M OHAMMAD ATHIQ – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, BANKING DEPARTMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims demand notice is illegal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petition's maintainability against private companies. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. principle regarding writ against private entities. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's decision on petition dismissal. (Para 6) |
| 5. conclusion on other pending applications. (Para 7) |
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.17317 OF 2025 ORDER:-
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claiming the following relief:
“To issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.2 in issuing impugned Demand Notice dated 27.03.2025 to pay an amount of Rs.7,00,935/- as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the Demand Notice dated
27.03.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent.”
2. The case of the petitioner is that, , Respondent Nos.2 & 3 herein issued Demand Notice dated 27.03.2025 to the petitioner calling upon him to pay loan amount of Rs.7,00,935/- and settle loan account under Loan Agreement No.PUNGATF2209290002 even though the petitioner cleared entire amount. A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
