Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, CJ, Ravi Cheemalapati, J
Attipalli Prabhakar Reddy and Others – Appellant
Versus
Lok Pal India and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court hears both sides regarding the validity of the complaint and investigation. (Para 6) |
| 2. investigation deemed necessary despite the petitioners' claims about lack of specific allegations. (Para 7) |
| 3. court finds sufficient basis for ongoing investigation and dismisses the petitions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
(Per Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati)
Aggrieved by the orders dated 27.04.2023 and 11.07.2023 passed by the Division bench of Hon’ble Lokpal of India, the petitioners filed W.P.Nos.14585 of 2023. Pursuant to the issuance of impugned orders, CBI has registered FIR against the petitioners bearing No.RC2182024A0005 and RC2182024A0004 dated 21.02.2024, as such filed W.P.Nos.7967 & 7968 of
2024 respectively to quash the same.
2. The brief facts that led to filing of writ petitions follow under:
(a) The 1st respondent has considered an anonymous complaint filed against petitioners for sanctioning loan to 32 loan accounts from Vishnu Nivasam Branch and 9 loan accounts from Tirupati Branch in Chittoor District without following prescribed norms or without any authority and in collusion with the borrowers during December 2013 to 2017. In wake of internal investigation, the Ba
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
