Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
T J MOHAMMAD ALI – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenged dispossession claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims based on procedural lapses. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defense claims based on forest laws. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. disputed ownership requires civil court resolution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. no contempt found; dismissing claims. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. final decision made on all petitions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
COMMON ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner, in short, in Writ Petition No.15368 of
2022 is that without passing orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2022 and 13.04.2022 and without following the procedure contemplated under the Act, respondent Nos.3 and 4-District Forest Officer and Forest Ranger, Palamaner Town & Mandal, Chittoor District respectively, are insisting the petitioner and other legal heirs to vacate from their respective lands admeasuring to an extent of Ac.16.99 cents in Paimashi No.107, an extent of Ac.13.00 cents in Paimashi No.108, and an extent of Ac.50.00 cents in Paimashi No.109, total extent of Ac.79.99 cents situated at Anupuvaripalli village, Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District.
2. Writ Petition No.21156 of 2022 has been filed questioning the action of respondent No.3-T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
