HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr V R K Krupa Sagar, J
Anjuru Sujatha and Others – Appellant
Versus
Anjuru Venkata Subbamma and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and initial court findings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding property ownership. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. legal context regarding the distinction between family business and partnership. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT:
1. Plaintiffs before the trial court are the appellants in this appeal filed under section 96 read with order 41 Rule 1 CPC . Three items of immovable property were the subject matter in O.S.194 of 2001 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore. Claiming that the plaint schedule properties were joint family properties, the suit was filed praying for partition and the prayer in the suit reads as below.
“The plaintiff therefore pray for a decree and Judgment in their favour: -
(a) directing the defendants to partition the 1/4th share of the plaintiffs in the plaint schedule properties and put them in separate possession thereof by passing preliminary decree thereof;
(b) passing final decree in pursuance of the preliminary decree, in case of non-compliance by the defendants 1 to 5 herein, through process of the court;
(c) granting costs of this suit; and
d) passing such other and further reliefs that are deeme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.