Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Rai Sahib Ramdyal Ghansi Ram and Sons v. Ramnivas
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutes acknowledgment under the limitation act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. issues of admissibility based on purpose of documents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. intention of parties determines evidence requirements. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. citations clarify acknowledgment versus evidentiary status. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. final ruling on revision petitioner’s position. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
1. The point posed by this revision petition is whether certain documents constitute acknowledgments within the purview of S.19 of the Indian Limitation Act or acknowledgments attracted by Art. 1 of Sch. 1 of the Hyderabad Stamp Act (IV of 1331 - F.) as amended by Regulation XIV of 1359 - F.
2. The facts leading up to this litigation may be shortly stated. The respondent executed two promissory notes on 23-1-1949 and 10-2-1949 for Rs.2,000/- and Rs.3,000/- respectively in favour of the petitioner - firm. Subsequently, he signed in the account books of the petitioner under certain entries containing the account between the parties on four occasions viz., on 4-11-1951, 30-10-1952, 27-10-1954 and 3-10-1956. A suit was laid by the petitioner for recovery of a sum of Rs.8,596-70 n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
