Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Satyanarayana Raju, *Seshachalapati, JJ.
Soma Ramanujulu v. Soma Narasimhulu
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the execution and claims related to the promissory note. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the liability of defendants in relation to the promissory notes. (Para 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. court observations on liabilities and evidentiary standards under the negotiable instruments act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 13) |
1. This is an appeal against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Cuddapah, in O.S. No.49 of 1954 on the file of his court. The appellant instituted the suit aforesaid against the six respondents in this appeal for the recovery of the money due under a promissory note executed by defendant., 1 and 4 in the action on 31/03/1953 marked as Ex. A - 3 in the case.
2. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendants 2 and 5, who are brothers, started a yarn business under the name and style of "Soma Venkatayya Gari Narasiah", and that they have been carrying on the business for the benefit of their two respective families. Defendants 1 and 3 are the sons of the second defendant. Defendants 4 and 6 are the sons of the 5th defendant. It is the case of the plaintiff that, for the benefit of the said joint family business, the defendan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
