SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Online)(AP) 26

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Chagla C. J., CJ
Commissioner of Income-tax Andhra Pradesh v. M/s. Ramadayal Ghansiram and Sons Hyderabad


Table of Content
1. applicability of art. 133 in tax appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. request for appeal based on findings. (Para 4 , 5)
3. advisory capacity of the court in tax references. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. assessment of case fitness for appeal. (Para 10)
5. final ruling of the court. (Para 11)

1. The question raised in this case is whether Art.133 of the Constitution is attracted to a decision given by this Court under S.66(1) of the Indian Income - tax Act.

2. The Commissioner of Income - tax seeks to file an appeal to the Supreme Court against a decision of this Court answering a reference under S.66(1) against the Department on the following question.
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of this case the erstwhile family house properties have been partitioned among the four members in definite portions for the purpose of S.25A of the Indian Income - tax Act, 1922?"

3. Taking all the facts and circumstances of the case we reached the conclusion that a partition had taken place among the members of the assessee family and that the erstwhile family house properties had been partitioned among the four members in definite portions within the meaning of S.25A (1) of the Income - t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top