SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Online)(AP) 30

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Mr. Chandra Reddy, Mr. Kumarayya, JJ
Mutyala Satyanarayanamurthi v. Muthyaia Jaggamma


1. These appeals arise out of the judgment and decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kakinada in D.S. No.142 of 1950. The defendant is the appellant in Appeal No.460 of 1958 while the plaintiff is the appellant in Appeal No.10 of 1959.

2. The circumstances which have given rise to this litigation may be briefly stated : The plaintiff is the second wife of the defendant. She filed the suit, out of which these appeals have arisen, against her husband for recovery of future maintenance at the rate of Rs.4,000/-per year and past maintenance for nine years at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per year. There was also a claim for jewels which was valued at Rs.5,000/- and for an account of her pasupukunkuma, amount (pin money) entrusted to the defendant by the plaintiff's father at the time of her marriage. There were other incidental reliefs.

3. It was alleged in the plaint that the defendant induced the plaintiffs parents, in or about December, 1928 to give her in marriage to him on the representation that he had left his first wife, who was unfit for marital life; that the plaintiff and the defendant were married and lived happily thereafter for about thirteen years till the year 1940, when








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top