Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Palasa Cashew Manufacturers Association Palasa represented by its President Sreerama Radha Krishnayya v. Chief Inspector of Factories Andhra Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common question arises regarding the worker status. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. determination of whether workers engaged are under the factories act. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. contracts of service defined by employer's control and supervision. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court affirms that convictions are correct based on the definitions of worker and factory. (Para 7 , 8) |
1. In these three criminal revision cases and the writ petition, a common question, arises for decision. The facts alleged in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition are not admitted by the respondents. But in the criminal revision cases, evidence was taken and the facts are investigated and found by the trial Magistrate and by the Sessions Court, Srikakulam in revision. It is stated by the learned Counsel appearing in the cases that the decision of the writ petition will be governed by the decision in the criminal revision cases. Therefore, I shall first deal with the criminal revision cases.
2. It is also stated by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners that the facts in alt the three revision cases are similar. So I shall first consider the Criminal Revision Case No. 234/61 which arises out of S. C. No. 1 o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
