ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
R. Subhash Reddy, J
Rajah Veltigoti Rangamannar Krishna Yachendra Bahadur Varu v. State of A. P
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing and context of appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments relating to validity of notifications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. questions of law addressed by the court. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. shifting burden of proof in law. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. reference to related case law. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. conclusion and fresh proceedings. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
1. This is an appeal against the judgment of dismissal of the suit, O. S. 8 of 1957, by the District Judge, Chittoor. This suit was laid for a declaration that the notifications made under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1948, hereinafter to be referred to as the Act with regard to the plaint schedule villages, were invalid. After the suit was filed, the State Government issued revised notifications classifying some of the plaint schedule villages as under - tenure estates under the Act. The trial was therefore confined to notifications with regard to 10 villages only, viz., Inagalore, Mannavram, Govindaraopalli, Polie Beemavaram, Kandaragunta, Empedu, Ammacheruvu, Bassiddummallu and Vampalli, as zamin estates. The plaintiffs questioned the validity of the notifications, as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.