SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Online)(AP) 6

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
R. Subhash Reddy, J
Rajah Veltigoti Rangamannar Krishna Yachendra Bahadur Varu v. State of A. P


Table of Content
1. filing and context of appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments relating to validity of notifications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. questions of law addressed by the court. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. shifting burden of proof in law. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. reference to related case law. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. conclusion and fresh proceedings. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

1. This is an appeal against the judgment of dismissal of the suit, O. S. 8 of 1957, by the District Judge, Chittoor. This suit was laid for a declaration that the notifications made under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1948, hereinafter to be referred to as the Act with regard to the plaint schedule villages, were invalid. After the suit was filed, the State Government issued revised notifications classifying some of the plaint schedule villages as under - tenure estates under the Act. The trial was therefore confined to notifications with regard to 10 villages only, viz., Inagalore, Mannavram, Govindaraopalli, Polie Beemavaram, Kandaragunta, Empedu, Ammacheruvu, Bassiddummallu and Vampalli, as zamin estates. The plaintiffs questioned the validity of the notifications, as


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top