SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Seshachelapati, J
Duddhela Subbamma (Died) v. D. S. Krishna Murty


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Mr. Narasinga Rao

Table of Content
1. the binding effect of a settlement deed executed by a limited owner. (Para 1 , 2)
2. contention on the reversionary rights and life estate. (Para 3)
3. affirmation of the lower courts’ rulings regarding the deed. (Para 4)
4. final ruling dismissing the appeal. (Para 5)

1. This appeal under Cl. 15 of the Letters Patent is against the judgment and decree of Justice Seshachelapati in S. A. No. 270 of 1959. The short point involved relates to the binding effect of Ex. A - 1 dated 19-6-1921 on defendant No. 1, Subbamma, who acted upon it and got benefit thereunder not only in her personal capacity but also as guardian of Nagarathnamma, her minor daughter.

2. A brief statement of facts is necessary to fully appreciate the point raised. The following is the genealogical table which gives the exact relationship of the plaintiff and the defendants.
The suit property comprising a house situate in Tirupathi originally belonged to one Narayanajja. He had two wives, Ammavamma and Munemma, and a daughter Mangamma by his first wife. Ammayamma pre - deceased Mangamma. The 1st defendant Subbamma is the daughter of Mangamma Subbamma had three daughters : Nagarathnamma the mother of plai








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top