ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A. S. Reddy, J
Achanta Subbaraju v. Cherukuri Suryanarayana Murthy
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of suits based on promissory notes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. validity of endorsements under the negotiable instruments act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. admissibility of endorsements as actionable claims. (Para 7 , 8) |
1. These seventeen revision petitions arise out of a common judgment given by the District Munsif, Razole on 30th January, 1962 whereby he dismissed seventeen suits filed by the plaintiff on the foot of promissory notes as holder in due course. The essential facts in order to appreciate the contentions raised before me may briefly be stated :
Sri Anantha Lakshmi Commercial Syndicate (hereinafter called the Syndicate) is a registered firm under the Indian Partnership Act. It was constituted solely for the purpose of running a chit fund business. There are two partners of the said firm, one S. Trimurty and the other Bapanayya. It was alleged that on 8-11-58 the firm was dissolved Bapanayya left the firm entrusting the whole business to S. Trimurty. On that date he endorsed the suit promissory notes in favour of S. Trimurty. S. Trimurty, thereafter endorsed all those promissory notes in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff therefore, styling himself as holder in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.