ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Judge Name Placeholder, J
Shimoga Oil Mills – Appellant
Versus
Sri Radhakrishna Oil Mills – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. parties' arguments regarding execution procedures. (Para 5 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. court's analysis of legal provisions. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 30 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. ratio decidendi on non-satisfaction certificate. (Para 29) |
| 5. final conclusion on appeal dismissal. (Para 34) |
1. This appeal by the attaching decree - holder is preferred against the judgment of the District Judge, Anantapur in A. S. No. 139/61 holding that E. P. No. 77/60 on the file of the Court of the subordinate Judge, Anantapur was not filed within three - years after the previous execution petition and is therefore, barred by limitation.
2. It is necessary to narrate briefly the facts of the case. The O. S. 46 of 1947-48, filed by the Shimoga Oil Mills in the Court of the subordinate Judge, Shimoga, against Sri Radhakrishna Oil Mills, Kadiri, the respondent herein, for the recovery of about Rs. 3,257 was dismissed on June 30, 1949, but decreed by the High Court of Mysore in R. A. No. 81/1949-50 on October 30, 1951. As the judgment - debtors are residents of and having properties only at Kadiri, s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.