Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Ramachandra Rao, J
Metal Press Works Ltd. Calcutta v. Guntur Merchants Cotton Press Co. Ltd
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lease terms and initial agreements (Para 1) |
| 2. trial court's findings on notice validity (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments on notice requirement (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. questions for appellate review (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. analysis of tenancy by holding over under s.116 (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. impact of original lease terms on holding over (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. legal implications of notice to quit and waiver (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 8. final determination and outcome of appeal (Para 45) |
1. The defendant - appellant took on lease the suit premises along with machinery, plant etc., belonging to the plaintiff - respondent originally for a period of two years under a registered agreement dated May 27, 1937 with an option to continue as tenant for a further period of two years. The annual rent stipulated was Rs. 1150/- and the lease was for manufacturing and industrial purposes. Another registered lease agreement under Ex. A - 2 dated June 20, 1941 was executed on a rent of Rs. 1,450/- per year for a period of two years commencing from 14-7-1941 with a similar option for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
