Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
string, string
Chandrasekhara Raju B. v. Deena Dayal Das
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for civil contempt alleging disobedience of court orders. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's instructions and the respondent's inaction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. petitioner's counsel contends respondent ignored court orders. (Para 11 , 12 , 18 , 21) |
| 4. assessment of respondent's knowledge and response to court orders. (Para 22 , 28 , 33) |
| 5. final determination of guilt and penalty for contempt. (Para 34) |
1. This is an application by the petitioner to punish the respondent for civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court in W.P.M.P. No. 5887/85 in W. P. No. 4141/85 dated 23-5-1985.
2. The following facts have to be stated, for a proper appreciation of the points arising in the case.
3. The petitioner is a Junior Accountant in the Sub-Treasury at Rajampet, Siddavatam Taluk, Cuddapah District. On certain allegations including falsification of accounts and misappropriation, the petitioner was kept under suspension on 7-2-1983 by orders issued by the respondent, who is the District Treasury Officer, Cuddapah. In the order of suspension dated 7-2-1983, however, no reasons were mentioned. The petitioner requested on 10-8-1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
