Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
P. A. Choudary, J
Kasani Narayana and Others v. Govt. of A.P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeal filed on the basis of locus standi. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial process requires grievance from the aggrieved party. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. limitations on locus standi concerning property rights. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. third-party interventions in property rights are not permissible. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. affirmation of the prior ruling on locus standi. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. The writ appeal has been filed by the appellants against an order of single Judge holding that the writ petitioners did not have locus standi to question the G. O. Ms. No. 501 (Revenue) dated 9-3-1983 which has been passed by the State Government under S.20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 .
2. On an application of the owner who owned excess vacant land, the impugned order as passed by the State Government under S.20 of the above, Urban Act granting exemption to the owner in respect of the excess land. The owner has no complaint against the order so passed in his favour. In fact he invited it and accepted it. Under S.20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 , the State Government has undoubted powers to pass such orders and to grant such exemption to an owner who holds vacant l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
