The suspension of a convict's sentence by the Government is invalid if the court was not consulted and ongoing appeal considerations were ignored, ensuring legislative actions remain within the law's jurisdiction.

1. Petitioner is the widow of late Sri Thirumalareddy Showrireddy, who was murdered at 7.00 p.m. on 5-10-1987. Police had registered crime No. 86/87 of Gurajala Police Station against the 3rd respondent and 15 others under S.302 read with S. 34, IPC, as also under S.324 and S.326, IPC. The crime was tried as S.C. No. 351/88 by the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur. It was subsequently transferred to the Court of Session, Ongole, where it was re - numbered as S.C. No. 11/91. The Sessions Judge, Ongole in his judgment dt. 4-10-1991 found the 3rd respondent and three others guilty of offence punishable under S. 302 read with S. 34, IPC. He sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and convicted two other accused under S.324 and S.326. The Sessions Judge acquitted the other accused. 3rd respondent and other accused who were convicted filed Criminal Appeal No. 1035/91 against the conviction and sentence. That appeal is pending. They also filed Criminal M.P. No. 2611/91 for suspension of the sentence and for their consequential release on bail, pending disposal of the appeal. This Court dismissed the application in so far as it related to 3rd respondent and three other accused (A - 1 to A - 4) and granted bail in respect of A - 5 and A - 6 who were convicted only under S.324 and S.326 of the I.P.C. 3rd respondent who was the 1st accused in the Sessions case had been elected as Member of the State Legislature from Gurajala Constituency. Since his application for bail was not granted, 3rd respondent was sent to Sub-Jail, Ongole. According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent, using his position as M.L.A, got himself admitted in Government hospital Ongole on 5-10-91. He was subsequently referred to the Government General Hospital, Guntur and was housed in a special ward. On the allegation that the 3rd respondent had no ailment which justified his continuance in the hospital, petitioner had filed W.P. No. 3760/92, which was admitted on 17-3-1992. On 16-3-1992, Government issued G.O. Rt. No. 738 Home (Prisons - C) Department, dt. 16-3-1992, suspending the sentence of the 3rd respondent from the date of release till the end of the Assembly Session, for the purpose of enabling him to attend the session. The order was passed purportedly under S. 432, Cr. P.C. 3rd respondent was released soon thereafter from the General Hospital, Guntur. Petitioner submits that the hospital authorities have been accommodating the 3rd respondent on the pretext of ailment which he was not suffering from.

2. Petitioner submits that the order of the State Government under S. 432, Cr. P.C. is illegal and vitiated by malafide exercise of power. She also submits that the Government should not have exercised its power under S. 432 of the Criminal P.C. Petitioner submits further that the Government had no power to suspend the sentence under S. 432, Cr. P. C. without reference to the Court which tried him. She submits that the Government should not have exercised its power for the purpose of subverting an order of the appellate Court refusing to grant bail to the 3rd respondent during the pendency of the appeal. She also submits that the Government granted suspension of sentence of the 3rd respondent only due to extraneous and irrelevant political influences. On these grounds petitioner submits that the order is liable to be s