ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
C. Praveen Kumar, J
Lingaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case facts establish a conviction based on a dying declaration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. accused's plea is one of denial. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. insufficient procedures in recording dying declaration affect its reliability. (Para 9 , 10 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. conviction and sentence overturned due to lack of evidence. (Para 21 , 22) |
1. The sole accused in Sessions Case No. 32 of 1990 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, is the appellant. The appellant - accused was charged for the offence of intentionally causing the death of his wifeSatyamma (deceased) by pouring kerosene on her and throwing a burning match - stick on her at 7 a.m. on 27-4-1989 at Masanpally cross - roads. The learned Additional Sessions Judge found him guilty of the offence; convicted him under S. 302, I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life.
2. The case of the prosecution is as follows : On 27-4-1989 at about 7.00 p.m. the accused came in a fully drunken state to his hotel at Masanpally cross - roads and demanded money from his wife - deceased for his drinking. As, by that time, he was already in a drunken condition, his wife refused to give money. On that, he poured kero
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.