Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Lingaraja Rath, J
Fakruddin S. and Others v. Govt. of A. P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial procedures and urgency in petition hearings. (Para 1) |
| 2. constitutional provisions for panchayati raj and elections. (Para 2 , 4 , 11) |
| 3. arguments against the bar on judicial review of election matters. (Para 3 , 6 , 14 , 24) |
| 4. election commission's powers and responsibilities. (Para 5 , 10 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. limits of parliamentary powers regarding judicial review. (Para 15 , 18) |
| 6. implications of elections and necessity of corrective measures. (Para 28 , 30) |
1. These petitions under Art.226 of the Constitution of India have travelled through a hearing for admission before a learned single Judge, before a Division Bench, before a Full Bench and the Larger Bench of ours with the speed the Court could manage to generate keeping in view the nature of the cases and the urgency for their disposal the sooner the possible. The Division Bench which heard these petitions for admission noticed the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 11106 of 1995 and that of the learned Government Pleader and also the fact that a batch of writ petitions having a common contention are pending hearing before a Full Bench. The order dated 13-6-1995 dir
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
