ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
N. Raghunandan Rao, J
A. Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. declaration and ownership disputes (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. notice requirement emphasized (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. impugned order quashed (Para 14 , 15) |
1. The petitioner prays for an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of a writ of certiorari by calling for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to Proceedings No. 9(1) / 6(1) / 6331/76 dated 16-11-1981 and quash the said proceedings and for consequential directions.
2. The facts necessary leading to the filing of this writ petition may be briefly summarised:
One A. Venkateswara Rao on his behalf and on behalf of his son A. Koteswara Rao, filed a statement in Form - I under S.6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short 'the Act'). The complete details of the lands held by Sri V. Venataswara Rao and his son A. Koteswara Rao were furnished in the said statement. The total extent of the land involved in the said statement is 6272 sq. mtrs., and according to the petitioner the entire land is occupied by the buildings which have been constructed much before the commencement of the Act i.e. 17-2-1976. The petitioner claims that it is not a vacant land. As an abundant caution
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.