Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
P. S. Mishra, C. J., *B. K. Somasekhara, V. Rajagopala Reddy, JJ.
Hon'ble Secretary and Correspondent Badruka College of Commerce and Arts (Day) Hyderabad v. State of A. P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court establishes jurisdiction under article 226. (Para 1) |
| 2. code of civil procedure not applicable to writ petitions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes speed and discretion in adjudicating writ petitions. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
1. The order of dismissal of W.P.M.P. No. 28739/95 in W.P.M.P.(SR) No. 116983/95 in W.P. No. 8394 of 1989 dated 18-6-1996 passed by the learned single Judge questioned in this appeal having a tinge of dealing with such matters arising out of proceedings under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India applying the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Limitation Act confronts us with these questions to lay down the correct law settled so far in this regard.
1. Whether (a) the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, the Code) and (b) the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 (in short, the Act) are applicable to the proceedings under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India (in short, the Constitution)?
2. If not, what is the effect of R.20, R.24 and R.25 of the Writ Proceeding Rules of Andhra Pradesh, 1977 (in short, the Rules)?
2. The Amendment Act of 1976 of the Code was brought into force with effect from 1-2-19
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
