Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Sri E. Manohar, J
Mahendar Tiwari v. Govt. of A.P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks enforcement of contract terms for toll collection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents argue petitioner accepted terms and agreed to conditions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court reviews applicability of writ jurisdiction in contractual contexts. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. legal references illustrate limits of state obligations in commercial contracts. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed due to lack of public element. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. The writ petition is disposed of finally on merits after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings for respondents.
2. The petitioner seeks a direction declaring the inaction of the respondents, in particular respondent No. 2, in not providing Toll Collection Booth and gate with electricity supply at K. M. 1/4 of Anakapalli By - pass at National Highway (for short 'N. H.') No. 5 and adequate protection for collection of the toll fee there. A further direction is sought that the respondents should not insist upon the payment of any quantum of lease amount from 9-8-1998 onwards till respondents construct the said toll gate and comply the other conditions referre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
