Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A. Hanumanthu, J
Referring Officer rep. by State of A. P. v. Accused in Crime No. 197/95 Police Station Khammam-2 and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of jurisdiction of special court under the act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussions about conflicting decisions of high courts. (Para 3) |
| 3. need for a definitive ruling on the procedure for special courts. (Para 4) |
| 4. analysis of legislative framework and jurisdictional issues. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. clarification on the committal process for the special court. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. framework of cognizance under various laws affecting special courts. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. recommendations and conclusions regarding legislative improvements. (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 8. call for action and fee arrangement for amicus curiae. (Para 57 , 58) |
1.The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Khammam invested with powers of Special Court constituted under S. 14 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') made the reference under S.395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and it is numbered as CrlRC. No. 905 and 1084 of 1996 on the file of High Court. The same learned Judge while working as Addl. Sessions Judge at Warangal who was also invested with the powers of Specia
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
