Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.
Pearl Beverages (M/s.) and Others v. State of A. P. and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial complaint and facts surrounding the fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the quashing of the fir. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. analysis of the legal provisions regarding firs and complaints. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. interpretation of legal standards and previous case law surrounding firs. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 5. conclusions on the court's power to quash firs. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 6. decision on not quashing the fir. (Para 59) |
| 7. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 60 , 61) |
1.This is an application filed under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "the Code") to quash the first information report No. 72 of 1999 registered against the petitioners herein under S.420 of the Indian Penal Code on the file of Gopalapuram Police Station, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh.
2. It may be necessary to notice a few relevant facts before adverting to the question as to whether this Court can quash the very first information report in exercise of its jurisdict
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
