SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Andhra Cements Ltd. Hyderabad v. Govt. of A.P. and Others


Table of Content
1. factual basis of the petitioner's claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. grounds for rejecting the prospecting licence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. mechanism for granting mining leass. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. principles of natural justice and discretion in granting licenses. (Para 12 , 32)
5. conclusion dismissing the appeal. (Para 49)

1The appellant (hereinafter referred to as "the petitioner") impugned the order dated 14-7-1999 whereby its application for grant of prospecting licence for limestone in the areas in villages Kesavapalli, Alugupadu, Shankara - puram and Gokulapadu was rejected by the first respondent. The petitioner sought for the directions to the respondent to issue prospecting licence for mining lease.

2. The petitioner is a public limited company claiming to be in the field of manufacturing cement. In the year 1987 the petitioner had applied for prospecting licence in respect of limestone in the areas in Kesavapalli, Alugumallipadu, Sankarapuram and Gogulapadu villages of Guntur District. It proclaimed the potentiality of manufacturing cement to the tune of 1.1 million tonnes per annum. Prior to 1990 the Company became sick. It applied to the Board for Industrial


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top