Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Guda Anjaneyulu and Another v. Govt. of A.P.and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed seeking mandamus. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners claim title, alternate remedy available. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments on statutory remedies, pending appeals. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. court's consideration of merits and issues at hand. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. court hearings and arguments presented. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 6. legal framework governing mining licenses determined. (Para 18 , 29) |
| 7. conclusion on maintaining writ petition and statutory remedies. (Para 24 , 31) |
| 8. final dismissal of petitions. (Para 32) |
1. W.P.No.25806 of 2001: In this writ petition, the petitioners seek for a direction in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the impugned proceedings vide No: 17752 / R3(2) / 2001, dated 29-8-2001 granting prospecting licence and the quarry licence vide proceedings No: 34354 / R3/2/2001, dated 12-11-2001 issued by the 2nd respondent in favour of the 7th respondent as arbitrary, illegal and vitiated by mala fide, misrepresentation and fraud and contrary to the directions of this Court issued in W.P.No:7303 of 1993 dated 16-2-2000:
2. When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, it is brought to my notice that having aggrieved by the impugned order, the petitioners
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
