SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Waterbase Ltd. v. K. Ravindra and Another


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S. Santhanaraman
For the Respondents: C. Padmanabha Reddy

1. This criminal appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 2-4-1997 passed by the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada in C.C. No. 321 of 1995.

2. The complainant filed the complaint against the accused for the offence punishable under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short "the N.I. Act"). The Court below, on evidence, found the accused not guilty of the said offence and accordingly acquitted him. Challenging the order of acquittal, the complainant had preferred this appeal.

3. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant is a company and it has been carrying on with the business of manufacturing and selling of prawn feed under the brand name "Luxe Water Base" and the accused is the distributor of the appellant in East Godavari District. During the said transaction, the accused fell due to a sum of Rs. 1,55,87,952/- and in due discharge of the said liability, the accused issued a cheque dated 26-1-1995 drawn on the Corporation Bank, Kakinada for a sum of Rs. 6,00,000/- in favour of the complainant. The complainant presented the said cheque on 27-1-1995 and the same was returned for want of sufficient funds and this fact was intimated to the




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top