Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
S. B. Sinha, CJ, V.V.S. Rao, J
N. Ram Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Secretary Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's enrolment application was incorrectly returned. (Para 2 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. decision lacked legal justification and disregarded petitioner's retirement rights. (Para 4 , 14 , 34) |
| 3. pending disciplinary proceedings don't obstruct enrolment post-retirement. (Para 10 , 12 , 20) |
1. Heard Sri Mohan Vinod for the petitioner and Sri A. Sudershan Reddy for the respondent.
2. The writ petition was filed by the petitioner, N. Ram Reddy, questioning the legality and validity of the order dated 15-12-2001 passed by the Enrolment Committee of the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh in returning his application for admission as Advocate on the roll of the Bar Council of the State of Andhra Pradesh.
3. The order impugned in this writ petition reads thus :
"With reference to your application cited above, I am to inform you that the Enrolment Committee of the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh at its meeting held on 13-12-2001 has considered your application and passed the following order :
It is stated in the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court, that the applicant is stated to be relieved on 6-4-2000. As such the present application in the present form cannot be processed and deserves to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
