Krishna Salt Works Partnership Firm Visakhapatnam v. State of A.P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2004 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
, J
Krishna Salt Works Partnership Firm Visakhapatnam v. State of A.P.

Table of Content
1. determination of land ownership and boundaries. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. jurisdiction and maintainability of suit. (Para 5 , 8 , 11 , 13 , 18)
3. court's examination of existing records and jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 15)
4. res judicata and finality of previous decisions. (Para 19 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. criteria for determining land classification. (Para 26 , 32 , 36 , 44)
6. final orders and remanding for further clarification. (Para 38 , 39 , 45)

1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed in OS No. 8 of 1979 dated 6-2-1980 on the file of the District Court, at Visakhapatnam.

2. The plaintiff is the appellant before this Court and the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

3. The plaintiff filed the above suit for declaration that the suit schedule land is not a communal poromboke but a ryoti land belonging to the plaintiff and consequently sought for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant / Government from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule land by the plaintiff, for recovery of Rs. 76,608/- being the penalty and paid interest as per memo, for subsequent interest, for costs and su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2004 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, JKrishna Salt Works Partnership Firm Visakhapatnam v. State of A.P.

Cases Referred (3)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
, J
Krishna Salt Works Partnership Firm Visakhapatnam v. State of A.P.