Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J
Villa Naga Lakshmi v. Mutta Srinivasa Rao
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the complaints concerning cheque dishonour. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on delay and amendments to the negotiable instruments act. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on jurisdiction and notice requirements. (Para 7 , 11 , 18) |
| 4. legal findings concerning the timeline of complaints and judicial procedures. (Para 12 , 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 5. final ruling to quash the proceedings. (Para 26) |
1. Seeking to have the proceedings in C.C. Nos. 172, 277 and 287 of 2004, on the file of VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam quashed, the sole accused, in these three criminal cases, has filed Criminal Petition Nos. 4350, 4351 and 4352 of 2004 before this Court. Since the petitioner - accused is the same in all the three cases, and as the question of law which arises for consideration is similar, all the three criminal petitions were heard together and are now being disposed of by a common order.
2. The allegations in the complaint, filed in C.C. No. 172 of 2004 under S.138 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, is that complainant is the absolute owner of 28 sq. yards of undivided and unspecified share of land, from out of an extent of 400 sq. yards situated in Sy.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
