SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(AP) 2

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
string, J
Branch Manager United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kondakotla Saroja


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

1. The insurance company filed this appeal challenging the correctness of order dated 26.11.2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge), Nizamabad in O P. No. 1173 of 2001.

2. The facts, in nutshell, giving rise to this appeal are that respondent No. 1 is the wife, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are the sons and respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are the mother and father of the deceased K. Rajamouli who died in a motor vehicle accident on 24.4.2001 at 3.30 a.m. in the shivar of Devanpally village. While he was proceeding from Kamareddy towards Banswada in a jeep bearing No. AP 25 - F 1895 owned by respondent No. 6 and insured with the appellant insurance company. Due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle by its driver, the vehicle turned turtle when it reached shivar of Devanpally village as a result of which the deceased sustained multiple injuries and died on the spot. On the death of the deceased, respondent Nos. 1 to 5 moved the Tribunal by way of filing the said O.P. under S.166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act') seeking compensation of Rs. 20,00,000. The owner of the vehicle filed a counter contending that the jeep was duly insured with





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top