Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
S. R. Sreeramulu, J
Ramu S. v. State of A.P.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner charged with asset possession disproportionate to income. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. authorization issues in investigation process highlighted. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. procedural compliance in investigations analyzed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court upheld the validity of the proceedings despite authorization defects. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling favors the continuation of judicial proceedings. (Para 11 , 12 , 18) |
1. This Criminal Petition under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('CrPC') is to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioner / accused in CC No. 11 of 2006 on the file of Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad for the offence punishable under S.13(2) read with 13(1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ("PC Act" for brevity) and S.109, S.468 and S.471 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC').
2. The petitioner while working as Additional Director of Income Tax (Investigation) in Mumbai was found to be in possession of assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. Basing on the said information, the Superintendent of Police, CBI, Hyderabad directed the Inspector of Police, CBI / SPE, Hyderabad to register a case and investigate into the same. Afte
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
