Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
,
Sree Ramulu N. v. B. Lakshmi Narayana and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. qualification for total disablement (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. provisions of workmen's compensation act (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. interpretation of injury types under the act (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. legal principles of loss of earning capacity (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. assessment of compensation and appeals (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. final judgments and decisions (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
1. Heard Mr. N. Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners in C.M.A. Nos. 1210 of 2001, 335, 550 and 1685 of 2002, 2274 of 2001, 3406 of 2002 and 2197 of 2003, Mrs. A. Malathi, learned counsel for the petitioner in C.M.A. No. 2380 of 2002, Mr. T.S. Rayalu, learned counsel for the petitioner in C.M.A. No. 856 of 2001 and Mr. T. Ramulu, learned counsel for the respondents in C.M.A. No. 1210 of 2001, Mrs. S.V. Sujatha, learned counsel for the respondent in C.M.A. No. 335 of 2002, Mrs. M. Seetha Devi, learned counsel for the respondent in C.M.A. No. 550 of 2002, Mr. A.V.K.S. Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent in C.M.A. No. 856 of 2001 and 1685 of 2002, Mr. R. Venkat Rao, learned counsel for the respondents in C.M.A. No. 2274 of 20
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
