Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Claimant – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Company Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the claim related to a hit and run accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction over compensation claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning and analysis on the applicability of sections 161 and 163. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling remanding the case for further proceedings. (Para 12) |
1. This MACMA is preferred by the claimant aggrieved by the Award dated 14 - 10-2008 in MVOP No.130 of 208 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - District Judge, Chittoor (for short "the Tribunal") where under the learned Chairman dismissed the petition of the claimant on the ground that claim petition which arise out of death of claimant's father in a hit and run motor vehicle accident is not maintainable before the Tribunal.
2. The claimant before the Tribunal is the appellant herein and the General Insurance Company Limited represented by its Company by name the United India Insurance Company Limited, Chittoor who was the respondent before the Tribunal is the respondent herein.
3. The factual matrix of the case is thus:
a) The claimant is the only son of A.Viswanatha Chetty and Kuppamma of Puthalapattu vill
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
