SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(AP) 5029

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A. Rama Rao, J
Andhra Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. v. Thota Padmaja Shalini and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Aravala Rama Rao
For the Respondents: Mr. Koppula Gopal

1. Challenging the order dated 16.12.2009 in MVOP No. 676 of 2005 passed by the learned Chairman, Principal Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - Principal District Judge, Nellore granting compensation of Rs. 48,58,400 against the claim of Rs. 70,00,000 for the death of one Thota Ramesh Babu in APSRTC bus accident, the respondent - APSRTC filed the instant appeal.

2. The matrix of the case is thus:
(a) The deceased was a Software Engineer working in Satyam Computer Services at Hyderabad. On 15.7.2005 at about 7.30 p.m. when the deceased was proceeding as a pillion rider on a two - wheeler driven by his colleague Racharla Siva Prasad on Venkatagiri Cross Road No. 5, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, the offending APSRTC bus bearing No. AP 10 - Z 1581 being driven by its driver at high speed and in a rash and negligent manner came and dashed the two - wheeler from behind due to which the deceased who was the pillion rider fell down and the bus ran over him causing his instantaneous death. The two - wheeler struck in between bus and its front car (sic) and thereby the rider sustained injuries. It is contended that the accident occurred due to fault of bus driver and because of sudden demise o






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top