Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Rami Reddy B. V. and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge renovation committee's constitution. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counteraffidavit details opposing arguments regarding committee formation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments about committee legality based on s.146 of the act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. examination of powers and roles under the relevant sections. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. consideration of public participation and statutory compliance in committee formation. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. court emphasizes reasonableness and fiduciary duties in administrative actions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. final decision to quash the impugned order. (Para 20) |
1. This writ petition is filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing G.O.Rt.No.645, Revenue (Endowments.II) Department, dated 07.10.2021 constituting a Renovation Committee to the 3rd respondent temple by appointing respondent Nos.4 to 9 as its members, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the petitioners hail from the family of Beeram Chenna Reddy, who was principally responsible for construction of the 3rd respondent temple. The 3rd respondent te
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
