Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Name, J
Smt Kavitha Gottipati – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to prior judgment in criminal case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the criminal case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. contentions regarding the credibility of child witnesses. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. evidentiary value of child witness testimonies. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. legal standards for assessing child witness evidence. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 24) |
| 6. establishing the attempt to commit rape. (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. affirmation of guilt and previous sentencing. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 8. principles for sentencing in serious crimes. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 9. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
1. Heard Sri T.S. Rayulu, learned counsel representing Smt Kavitha Gottipati, for the petitioner revisionist and Sri S. Venkata Sai, learned Special Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent / State.
2. The criminal revision under S.397 and S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C") has been filed challenging the judgment dated 22.03.2007, passed by the X Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur at Narasaraopet, partly allowing the appeal of the petitioner in Crl.A.No.4 of 2005, maintaining the judgment dated 05.10.2004, convicting the petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
