ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Name, J
Smt Kavitha Gottipati – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1. Heard Sri T.S. Rayulu, learned counsel representing Smt Kavitha Gottipati, for the petitioner revisionist and Sri S. Venkata Sai, learned Special Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent / State.
2. The criminal revision under S.397 and S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C") has been filed challenging the judgment dated 22.03.2007, passed by the X Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur at Narasaraopet, partly allowing the appeal of the petitioner in Crl.A.No.4 of 2005, maintaining the judgment dated 05.10.2004, convicting the petitioner for offence under S.376 read with 511 , IPC, but reducing the sentence of 5 years R.I as imposed by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Gurazala in S.C.No.160 of 2004 to 4 years R.I and confirming the remaining portion of the sentence.
3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Piduguralla Police Station, filed the charge sheet against the petitioner - accused stating that on 29.12.2003 at about 12.00 noon when "the victim" along with P.Ws.3 to 5 went to the fields to collect plum fruits (Regu Pallu), the accused with evil intention to commit rape, took the victim towards the red gram field near Daggu Bhavi, threw her down remo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.