Back
ANDHRA PRADHESH HIGH COURT
S. R. Krishna Kumar, J
Vasudeva Rao C. v. State of A. P.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim and rejection of nomination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. efficacious remedies available before civil courts. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments against the rejection of nomination. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's authority and jurisdiction limitations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. interference with election processes is limited. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. right to contest an election is statutory, not fundamental. (Para 36 , 37 , 39) |
| 7. writ petition not maintainable; recommended civil remedy. (Para 43 , 44) |
1. The petitioner has invoked the extra - ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Art.226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd respondent Election Officer in rejecting the nomination of the petitioner on the ground that his name is not tallying with the serial number in the voters list, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of R.22(5) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Conduct of Election Rules, 1964, and consequently, sought direction to the 3rd respondent to stay further proceedings pursuant to the issuance of election notification, dated 29.03.2022.
2. FACTUAL MATRIX: -
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
