Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
T. Amarnath Goud, J
Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Regional Development Authority v. Pydi Sarvanamma
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of petition and procedural context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts establishing basis for the suit. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal framework concerning commercial disputes. (Para 6 , 8 , 14) |
| 4. arguments made by both sides regarding jurisdiction. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 18) |
| 5. court's rationale on commercial classification. (Para 12 , 13 , 17) |
| 6. final judgment and remand instructions. (Para 19 , 20) |
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Order dated 17.08.2022 in I.A. No. 681 of 2022 in O.S.No.140 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Medchal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, as being illegal and contrary to settled principles of law.
2. Heard Mr. G.T. Shekar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Kalyan Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record.
3. The petitioner herein is the defendant No.1 in the suit filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 5 as plaintiffs. The respondent Nos. 1 to 5 herein filed the suit being O.S. No. 140 of 2021 seeking mandatory and perpetual injunction and for declaration of sale deeds executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondents Nos.6 to 10 as and void.
4. The brief facts as e
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
