Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Judge, J
A.4 and A.5 – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and parties' roles. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. defendants argue against the prosecution based on analyst discrepancies and timeliness. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. court analyzes the limitation based on guidelines from legal precedents. (Para 8 , 15) |
| 4. the court concludes by dismissing the petition and allowing the case to proceed. (Para 17 , 19) |
1. This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioners / A.4 and A.5 under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , (for short "CrPC") for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.569 of 2013 on the file of the Court of II Additional Munsif Magistrate, Ongole for the offence under S.29(1)(a) read with S.3(K)(i) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), against them.
2. Heard Sri Avinash Desai, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1 - State and Sri C. Subodh, learned counsel for nd the 2 respondent, apart from perusing the material available on record.
3. The brief facts of the case are that A.1 is the firm dealing with the pesticides business as a retail dealer under the name and style of "M/s. Agros Rythu Seva Kendram", Pamur, and A.2 i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
