Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Judge, J
Sudula Nagalakshmi v. Chellu Naga Sankara Rao
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition challenges dismissal of amendment application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding order validity. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. court evaluates jurisdiction and grounds for interference. (Para 10 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. background facts relevant to the case development. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling on the petition. (Para 17) |
1. Plaintiff in O.S.No.512 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Senior Civil, Judge, Vijayawada is the petitioner in the present Revision, filed under Art.227 of the Constitution of India
2. This Revision challenges the order, dated 11.05.2023, dismissing I.A.No.668 of 2022, filed by the petitioner herein under Order VI, R.17 of the Code of Civil Procedure .
3. Petitioner herein instituted the said suit for declaration of title and for permanent injunction. Plaint schedule property is an extent of 369.26 square yards of site with Bangalore tiled house therein, bearing Assessment No.27 and D.No.53/1A, after sub-division now in R.S.No.53/1A 1B, Tummalapalem, Village and Gram Panchayat area, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District.
4. Admittedly, the suit is at the stage of arguments. On 21.11.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
