Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
N. Raghunandan Rao, J
Tadisetti Venkateswara Rao alias Venkanna v. Manda Murali Nancharaiah
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. second appeal jurisdiction and substantial questions. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. background and origination of the property dispute. (Para 2 , 3 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. contest on ownership and possession. (Para 6 , 7 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. requirement of proof and legal burden. (Para 12 , 13 , 21) |
| 5. outcome of the appeal and its dismissal. (Para 22) |
1. This second appeal is filed aggrieved against the Judgment and decree dated 09.11.2022 in A.S.No.73 of 2017, on the file of the X Additional District Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam ("First Appellate Court" for short), confirming the Judgment and decree, dated 15.09.2017 in O.S.No.141 of 2011, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam ("Trial Court" for short).
2. The appellant herein is the defendant and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.141 of 2011, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam.
3. The plaintiff initiated action in O.S.No.141 of 2011, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, with a prayer for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his kith and kin, servants, agents and henchmen from ever interfering with his peaceful possession and enj
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
