SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 15393

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
MANDAPAKA CHINA KAMESWARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 26215/2025



APHC010508742025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3330]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 26215/2025

Between:

1. MANDAPAKA CHINA KAMESWARA RAO, S/O VISHNU

MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 1-59, MUNAGALA VILLAGE, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST

GODAVARI DISTRICT

2. MANDAPAKA VENKATAPATHI,, S/O CHINNA KAMESWARA

RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 1-59, MUNAGALA VILLAGE, KORUKONDAMANDAL, EAST GODAVARI

DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,

VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , EAST GODAVARI

DISTRICT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

5. SUB COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

6. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI

DISTRICT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

7. THE MANDAL TAHASILDAR, KORUKONDA MANDAL,

KORUKONDA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

8. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KORUKONDA PS,

KORUKONDA

9. VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, , MUNAGALA VILLAGE

KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

10. RENTALA ANANTHA SREE RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, S/O

GANGA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, MUNAGALA VILLAGE, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST

GODAVARI DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that

in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High

Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus a) Declaring the action of the official respondents 7 and 8, without following due process of law and interfering into petitioners peaceful possession over the land of an extent of Ac. 3.16 cents in Sy. No. 57/1 of Munagala Village, Korukonda Mandal, East Godavari District is illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust, contrary to law and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Articles 14,16,19 and 300A of Constitution of India onsequently directing the official respondents follow due process of law that not to interfering into petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment by cultivating over the land an extent of Ac. 3.16 cents in Sy. No. 57/1 of Munagala Village of Korukonda Mandal, East Godavari District c) Pass such other order and orders that may deem fit and proper for the circumstance of the case in the interest of justice or else we put to irreparable loss and sustain serious hardship IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the official respondents to follow due process of law including not to interfere into petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment by cultivating the land of an extent of Ac. 3.16 cents in Sy. No. 57/1 of Munagala Village Korukonda Mandal, East Godavari District pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. R K ACHARYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

2. GP FOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.26215 of 2025 ORDER:-

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus a) Declaring the action of the official respondents 7 and 8, without following due process of law and interfering into petitioners’ peaceful possession over the land of an extent of Ac.3.16 cents in Sy.No.57/1 of Munagala Village, Korukonda Mandal, East Godavari District, is illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust, contrary to law and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Articles 14,16,19 and 300A of Consti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top