HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
Singari Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 19261/2019
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:57774
APHC010401302019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3368]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 19261/2019
Between:
1. SINGARI SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGE 42
YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, H.NO.120/2,
RAMALAKSHMANA VEEDHI, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI.
3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME
INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH.AT AMARAVATI,
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARKAPURAM TOWN
POLICE STATION, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.
5. NATUKULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, R/O.
H.NO.7-662-27J, SIVAJINAGAR, 8TH LINE, MARKAPURAM,
PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High
Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction
more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the
action of the Respondent No.2 in not entrusting the crimes in F.I.R.
No(s).149 and 150 of 2019 of Markapuram Town Police Station,
Prakasham District to the Crime Investigation Department is arbitrary
and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India
consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to entrust the crimes in
##PAGE2##2
2025:APHC:57774
F.I.R.No(s).149 and 150 of 2019 of Markapuram Town Police Station,
Prakasham District
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the
High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to
pass orders on the representation dated 21-09-2019
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##3
2025:APHC:57774
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.19261 OF 2019
ORDER:
Sri G. Ratna Kumnar, learned counsel representing
Sri B. Sasibushan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, would
submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further
adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader
for Home, representing respondent Nos.1 to 4, is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the
petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be
no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in
this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________
JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
22nd December, 2025
cbn
##PAGE4##4
2025:APHC:57774
116
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No: 19261 OF 2019
22nd December, 2025
cbn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.