SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16069

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUMATHI JAGADAM
M DAMODAR REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent


TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 19954/2024

Between:

M Damodar Reddy ...PETITIONER

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BATHALA RAMESH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents not releasing the payment of balance amount of Rs.7,73,452/- vide M-Book No.6800 ACA even after finalizing the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., Providing CC walls in place of existing damaged lining portion & culvert on Chinthakommadinne branch channel at CSI church near Chinthakommadinne (V) Allagadda (M) in Nandyal District vide Agreement No.120/2023-24 dated 09.06.2023 is questioned as the same is illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents consider for payment of amounts of Rs.7,73,452/- vide M-Book No.6800 ACA with interest @

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top