SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16139

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI NATH TILHARI,NYAPATHY VIJAY
SHEIK DADA MIAH – Appellant
Versus
S.ZIYAUR RAHIMAN – Respondent


* THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

+ C.M.A. NO: 480/2022 % Dated: 02.01.2025

# Sheik Dada Miah and 4 others …… Appellants

and

$ Sri S.Ziyaur Rahiman and another ….. Respondents

! Counsel for the Appellants : Sri Virupaksha Dattatreya Gowda

^ Counsel for the Respondents : Sri K.Narsireddy

< GIST :

> HEAD NOTE :

? Cases referred :

1. AIR 2011 SC 3234 2. (1996) 4 SCC 526

3. 2022(2)ALD 357 4. (2010) SCC 689

5. (2010) 1 SCC 689 6. (1992) 1 SCC 719

7. 990SUPP(1)SCC727

8. 1993(3) SCC 161

9. 2022 SCC OnLine AP 135:AIR 2022 AP 59

10. (2012(4) SCC 689) 11. (2010(2) SCC 142)

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.M.A. NO: 480/2022 Between:

Sheik Dada Miah and 4 others …… Appellants and Sri S.ZiyaurRahiman and another ….. Respondents DATE OF ORDER PRONOUNCED: 02.01.2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No Marked to Law Reporters/Journals.

3. Whether Their Lordship wishes Yes/No to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ____________

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top